The film is just a documentation of the 80's crisis in the US, and stars Leonardo DiCaprio in the lead..
Martin Scorsese's "The Wolf of Wall Street" is abashed and shameless, thrilling and exhausting, disgusting and illuminating; it is one of the most exciting movies ever made about loathsome men. Its big name Leonardo DiCaprio has compared it to the story of the Roman emperor Caligula, and he is no longer some distance off the mark.
Many human beings get a contact high from following the exploits of entrepreneurs, financiers, bankers, CEO and the like, and when such guys get busted for skirting or breaking laws, they root for them as if they have been disreputable people heroes, gangsters with fountain pens as a substitute of guns—guys who, for all their selfishness and cruelty, are above the petty guidelines that constrict the rest of us. Such guys are addicts, egged on through a cheering part of little guys who fantasise of being big.
After a certain range of decades, we must ask if the nonstop enabling of addicts like Belfort does not suggest that, in some sense, their enablers are addicted, too—that they are part of a perpetual-motion wheel that simply maintains turning and turning. In the end "Wolf" is no longer so much about one addict as it is about America's dependence to capitalist excess and the "He who dies with the most toys wins" mindset, which has proved as long lasting as the image of the snarling gangster taking what he likes when he feels like taking it.
It's not simply these characters, and this setting, and this specific story. It's the world we live in. He's a motivational speaker now, and if you read interviews with him, or his memoir, it is apparent that he was never really sorry about anything but getting caught. We laugh at the movie, however guys like Belfort will in no way stop laughing at us.